KEAT vs VOO

KEAT vs VOO

Which is better, KEAT or VOO?

Each has led over a different period.

VOO has a lower expense ratio. KEAT led over 1Y, VOO over the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 67.9%.

Lower Fees: VOOHigher Returns: splitLess Concentrated: VOO

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricKEATVOO
Expense Ratio0.85%0.03%Best
AUM$124M$997.4B
Dividend Yield2.40%1.04%
Holdings30509
YTD Return+14.32%Best+11.55%
1Y Return+21.70%Best+17.54%
3Y Return (annualized)-+20.71%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.80%
Volatility (annualized)11.9%Best12.2%
Max Drawdown-10.6%Best-18.7%
$10,000 over 2.5 years$14,555$15,010Best
Top 10 Weight67.9%36.4%Best
Fund FamilyKeating Investment CounselorsVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionMar 27, 2024Sep 7, 2010

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 27, 2024 to Sep 10, 2026 (2.5 years).

KEAT vs VOO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.5 years both funds cover.

KEAT vs VOO Performance

Keating Active ETF (KEAT) is an ETF from Keating Investment Counselors and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year KEAT returned +21.70% while VOO returned +17.54%. Year to date, KEAT is up 14.32% versus a gain of 11.55% for VOO.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.2% compared with 11.9% for KEAT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -10.6% for KEAT and -18.7% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.15. They move largely independently of each other.

Fees and Cost Over Time

KEAT charges 0.85% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $3 annually, a gap of $82 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KEAT currently yields 2.40% against 1.04% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

KEAT already in VOO10.8%
VOO already in KEAT1.0%

10.8% of KEAT's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 1.0% of VOO's money is in holdings KEAT also owns.

KEAT and VOO share little of their money.

The two holdings books were reported 64 days apart, KEAT as of Sep 2, 2026 and VOO as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.

6 positions in common, counted across the 29 positions we hold weights for in KEAT and 505 in VOO, against full books of 30 and 509.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 490 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for KEAT (98.4% of the fund), and 11 for KEAT that do not appear in VOO (54.9%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in KEATWeight in VOODifference
VZVerizon Communications, Inc.3.57%0.27%3.30%
LMTLockheed Martin Corp2.63%0.16%2.47%
TAPMolson Coors Brewing Co. Class B2.72%0.01%2.71%
PMPhilip Morris International Inc.1.01%0.44%0.57%
UPSUnited Parcel Service, Inc0.51%0.12%0.39%
WYWeyerhaeuser Co.0.40%0.03%0.37%

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of KEAT and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

KEATVOO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, KEAT or VOO?

KEAT has an expense ratio of 0.85% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $82 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, KEAT or VOO?

Over the past year KEAT returned +21.70% vs +17.54% for VOO, so KEAT leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, KEAT or VOO?

VOO has been the more volatile fund at 12.2% annualized versus 11.9% for KEAT. Worst drawdown: KEAT -10.6% vs VOO -18.7%.

Should I hold both KEAT and VOO?

KEAT and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.15, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between KEAT and VOO?

10.8% of KEAT's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 1.0% of VOO's is in holdings KEAT also owns. They hold 6 positions in common, counted across the 29 positions we hold weights for in KEAT and 505 in VOO.

Which pays a higher dividend, KEAT or VOO?

KEAT yields 2.40% while VOO yields 1.04%, so KEAT currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VOO better than KEAT?

VOO has a lower expense ratio. KEAT led over 1Y, VOO over the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 67.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.