KLMT vs VXUS
Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KLMT | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.10% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $1.5B | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.76% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 518 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +14.63% | +14.19% | |
| 1Y Return | +24.26% | +27.38% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.53% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.03% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.0% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -16.9% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 26, 2024 | Jan 26, 2011 |
KLMT vs VXUS Performance
Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF (KLMT) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year KLMT returned +24.26% while VXUS returned +27.38%. Year to date, KLMT is up 14.63% versus a gain of 14.19% for VXUS.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 11.0% for KLMT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.9% for KLMT and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KLMT charges 0.10% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $10 vs $5 annually, a gap of $5 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KLMT currently yields 1.76% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
KLMT and VXUS share 190 holdings out of 8168 unique holdings combined, representing a 21.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KLMT or VXUS?
KLMT has an expense ratio of 0.10% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $5 per year of difference.
Which performed better, KLMT or VXUS?
Over the past year KLMT returned +24.26% vs +27.38% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), KLMT annualized +19.43% vs +4.83% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, KLMT or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 11.0% for KLMT. Worst drawdown: KLMT -16.9% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both KLMT and VXUS?
KLMT and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between KLMT and VXUS?
KLMT and VXUS share 190 common holdings with a 21.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 8168 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, KLMT or VXUS?
KLMT yields 1.76% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.