KLMT vs VYM
Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KLMT | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.10% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $1.5B | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.76% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 518 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | +14.63% | +16.16% | |
| 1Y Return | +24.26% | +26.05% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.43% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.21% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.0% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -16.9% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 26, 2024 | Nov 10, 2006 |
KLMT vs VYM Performance
Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF (KLMT) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year KLMT returned +24.26% while VYM returned +26.05%. Year to date, KLMT is up 14.63% versus a gain of 16.16% for VYM.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 11.0% for KLMT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.9% for KLMT and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KLMT charges 0.10% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $10 vs $4 annually, a gap of $6 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KLMT currently yields 1.76% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
KLMT and VYM share 109 holdings out of 946 unique holdings combined, representing a 21.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KLMT or VYM?
KLMT has an expense ratio of 0.10% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $6 per year of difference.
Which performed better, KLMT or VYM?
Over the past year KLMT returned +24.26% vs +26.05% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), KLMT annualized +19.43% vs +7.09% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, KLMT or VYM?
VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 11.0% for KLMT. Worst drawdown: KLMT -16.9% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both KLMT and VYM?
KLMT and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between KLMT and VYM?
KLMT and VYM share 109 common holdings with a 21.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 946 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, KLMT or VYM?
KLMT yields 1.76% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.