KLMT vs VTI
Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, KLMT or VTI?
Nearly the same fund. VTI costs less.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. KLMT led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95. KLMT is less concentrated, with 24.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KLMT | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.10% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $1.6B | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.72% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 517 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +12.81%Best | +11.95% |
| 1Y Return | +16.62%Best | +15.05% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.32% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.50% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.0%Best | 12.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -16.9%Best | -19.3% |
| $10,000 over 2.3 years | $14,440Best | $14,408 |
| Top 10 Weight | 24.6%Best | 33.3% |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 26, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 26, 2024 to Sep 30, 2026 (2.3 years).
KLMT vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.3 years both funds cover.
KLMT vs VTI Performance
Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF (KLMT) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year KLMT returned +16.62% while VTI returned +15.05%. Year to date, KLMT is up 12.81% versus a gain of 11.95% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.3% compared with 11.0% for KLMT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.9% for KLMT and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.95. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KLMT charges 0.10% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $10 vs $3 annually, a gap of $7 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KLMT currently yields 1.72% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
63.6% of KLMT's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 76.8% of VTI's money is in holdings KLMT also owns.
Most of VTI is already inside KLMT. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
245 positions in common, counted across the 499 positions we hold weights for in KLMT and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 517 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 908 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for KLMT (20.8% of the fund), and 19 for KLMT that do not appear in VTI (3.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in KLMT | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 4.96% | 6.40% | 1.44% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 4.53% | 6.29% | 1.76% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 3.50% | 4.79% | 1.29% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 2.44% | 3.65% | 1.21% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 2.13% | 2.90% | 0.77% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 1.62% | 2.56% | 0.94% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 1.30% | 2.31% | 1.01% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 1.24% | 1.70% | 0.46% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.07% | 1.29% | 0.22% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 0.91% | 1.35% | 0.44% |
76.8% of VTI is already inside KLMT.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KLMT or VTI?
KLMT has an expense ratio of 0.10% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $7 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, KLMT or VTI?
Over the past year KLMT returned +16.62% vs +15.05% for VTI, so KLMT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), KLMT annualized +17.32% vs +17.21% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, KLMT or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 12.3% annualized versus 11.0% for KLMT. Worst drawdown: KLMT -16.9% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both KLMT and VTI?
KLMT and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.95, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between KLMT and VTI?
76.8% of VTI's money is in holdings KLMT also owns. 76.8% of VTI's is in holdings KLMT also owns. They hold 245 positions in common, counted across the 499 positions we hold weights for in KLMT and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, KLMT or VTI?
KLMT yields 1.72% while VTI yields 1.03%, so KLMT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than KLMT?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. KLMT led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95. KLMT is less concentrated, with 24.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.