KLMT vs VTI
Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. KLMT delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KLMT | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.10% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1.5B | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.76% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 518 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +14.63% | +13.87% | |
| 1Y Return | +24.26% | +23.31% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.17% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.0% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -16.9% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 26, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
KLMT vs VTI Performance
Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF (KLMT) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year KLMT returned +24.26% while VTI returned +23.31%. Year to date, KLMT is up 14.63% versus a gain of 13.87% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 11.0% for KLMT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.9% for KLMT and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.95. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KLMT charges 0.10% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $10 vs $3 annually, a gap of $7 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KLMT currently yields 1.76% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
KLMT and VTI share 243 holdings out of 3037 unique holdings combined, representing a 59.9% weight overlap.
High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KLMT or VTI?
KLMT has an expense ratio of 0.10% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $7 per year of difference.
Which performed better, KLMT or VTI?
Over the past year KLMT returned +24.26% vs +23.31% for VTI, so KLMT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), KLMT annualized +19.43% vs +8.13% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, KLMT or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 11.0% for KLMT. Worst drawdown: KLMT -16.9% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both KLMT and VTI?
KLMT and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.95, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between KLMT and VTI?
KLMT and VTI share 243 common holdings with a 59.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 3037 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, KLMT or VTI?
KLMT yields 1.76% while VTI yields 1.07%, so KLMT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.