KLMT vs SCHD
Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD delivered stronger 1-year returns. KLMT offers more diversification with 497 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KLMT | SCHD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.10% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $1.5B | $103.7B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.76% | 3.31% | |
| Holdings | 518 | 104 | |
| YTD Return | +14.81% | +25.33% | |
| 1Y Return | +24.46% | +32.31% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.40% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.70% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.1% | 13.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -16.9% | -33.4% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Charles Schwab Asset Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 26, 2024 | Oct 20, 2011 |
KLMT vs SCHD Performance
Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF (KLMT) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year KLMT returned +24.46% while SCHD returned +32.31%. Year to date, KLMT is up 14.81% versus a gain of 25.33% for SCHD.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SCHD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.6% compared with 11.1% for KLMT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.9% for KLMT and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.42. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KLMT charges 0.10% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $10 vs $6 annually, a gap of $4 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KLMT currently yields 1.76% against 3.31% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
KLMT and SCHD share 29 holdings out of 568 unique holdings combined, representing a 5.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KLMT or SCHD?
KLMT has an expense ratio of 0.10% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $4 per year of difference.
Which performed better, KLMT or SCHD?
Over the past year KLMT returned +24.46% vs +32.31% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), KLMT annualized +19.55% vs +11.45% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, KLMT or SCHD?
SCHD has been the more volatile fund at 13.6% annualized versus 11.1% for KLMT. Worst drawdown: KLMT -16.9% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both KLMT and SCHD?
KLMT and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.42, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between KLMT and SCHD?
KLMT and SCHD share 29 common holdings with a 5.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 568 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, KLMT or SCHD?
KLMT yields 1.76% while SCHD yields 3.31%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.