KWH vs VTI

KWH vs VTI

Which is better, KWH or VTI?

Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. KWH is less concentrated, with 32.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%.

Lower Fees: VTILess Concentrated: KWH

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricKWHVTI
Expense Ratio0.60%0.03%Best
AUM$55M$690.1B
Dividend Yield0.00%1.03%
Holdings723,524
YTD Return-4.64%+14.14%Best
1Y Return-+16.22%
3Y Return (annualized)-+22.93%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.76%
Top 10 Weight32.1%Best33.3%
Fund FamilyGMOVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap ValueLarge Cap Blend
InceptionJul 14, 2026May 24, 2001

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

KWH vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

KWH vs VTI Performance

GMO Power Infrastructure ETF (KWH) is an ETF from GMO and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, KWH is down 4.64% versus a gain of 14.14% for VTI.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

KWH charges 0.60% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $3 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KWH currently yields 0.00% against 1.03% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

KWH already in VTI52.8%
VTI already in KWH2.9%

52.8% of KWH's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 2.9% of VTI's money is in holdings KWH also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

40 positions in common, counted across the 70 positions we hold weights for in KWH and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 72 and 3,524.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 1,113 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for KWH (94.6% of the fund), and 4 for KWH that do not appear in VTI (4.7%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in KWHWeight in VTIDifference
ETNEaton Corp Plc4.00%0.22%3.78%
TTTt Trane Technologies Plc2.80%0.14%2.66%
NEENextera Energy Inc2.60%0.25%2.35%
SOSouthern Co.2.10%0.15%1.95%
DUKDuke Energy Corp2.00%0.14%1.86%
EXCExelon1.90%0.07%1.83%
EQTEQT Corp.1.90%0.05%1.85%
EXEExpand Energy Corp1.90%0.03%1.87%
EDConsolidated Edison Inc1.80%0.06%1.74%
AEPAmerican Electric Power Co Inc1.70%0.10%1.60%

52.8% of KWH is already inside VTI.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

KWHVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, KWH or VTI?

KWH has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $57 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between KWH and VTI?

52.8% of KWH's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 2.9% of VTI's is in holdings KWH also owns. They hold 40 positions in common, counted across the 70 positions we hold weights for in KWH and 3,463 in VTI.

Which pays a higher dividend, KWH or VTI?

KWH yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than KWH?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. KWH is less concentrated, with 32.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.