KWH vs VOO
GMO Power Infrastructure ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, KWH or VOO?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. KWH is less concentrated, with 32.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KWH | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $55M | $1.0T |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 72 | 506 |
| YTD Return | -5.91% | +12.75%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +15.60% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.95% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.55% |
| Top 10 Weight | 32.1%Best | 37.6% |
| Fund Family | GMO | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 14, 2026 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
KWH vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
KWH vs VOO Performance
GMO Power Infrastructure ETF (KWH) is an ETF from GMO and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, KWH is down 5.91% versus a gain of 12.75% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KWH charges 0.60% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $3 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KWH currently yields 0.00% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
42.5% of KWH's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 2.9% of VOO's money is in holdings KWH also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
28 positions in common, counted across the 70 positions we hold weights for in KWH and 494 in VOO, against full books of 72 and 506.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 459 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for KWH (96.3% of the fund), and 15 for KWH that do not appear in VOO (14.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in KWH | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ETNEaton Corp Plc | 4.00% | 0.25% | 3.75% |
| TTTt Trane Technologies Plc | 2.80% | 0.16% | 2.64% |
| NEENextera Energy Inc | 2.60% | 0.28% | 2.32% |
| SOSouthern Co. | 2.10% | 0.17% | 1.93% |
| DUKDuke Energy Corp | 2.00% | 0.15% | 1.85% |
| EXCExelon | 1.90% | 0.07% | 1.83% |
| EQTEQT Corp. | 1.90% | 0.05% | 1.85% |
| EXEExpand Energy Corp | 1.90% | 0.03% | 1.87% |
| EDConsolidated Edison Inc | 1.80% | 0.06% | 1.74% |
| AEPAmerican Electric Power Co Inc | 1.70% | 0.11% | 1.59% |
42.5% of KWH is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KWH or VOO?
KWH has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $57 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between KWH and VOO?
42.5% of KWH's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 2.9% of VOO's is in holdings KWH also owns. They hold 28 positions in common, counted across the 70 positions we hold weights for in KWH and 494 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, KWH or VOO?
KWH yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than KWH?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. KWH is less concentrated, with 32.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.