LBO vs VTI
WHITEWOLF Publicly Listed Private Equity ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LBO | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 6.53% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $8M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 6.38% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 44 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -4.92% | +14.82% | |
| 1Y Return | -11.80% | +22.43% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.93% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.34% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.8% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -32.9% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | White Wolf Capital Advisors | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 30, 2023 | May 24, 2001 |
LBO vs VTI Performance
WHITEWOLF Publicly Listed Private Equity ETF (LBO) is a ETF from White Wolf Capital Advisors and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year LBO returned -11.80% while VTI returned +22.43%. Year to date, LBO is down 4.92% versus a gain of 14.82% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
LBO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.8% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -32.9% for LBO and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.50. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LBO charges 6.53% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $653 vs $3 annually, a gap of $650 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LBO currently yields 6.38% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
LBO and VTI share 11 holdings out of 2815 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LBO or VTI?
LBO has an expense ratio of 6.53% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $650 per year of difference.
Which performed better, LBO or VTI?
Over the past year LBO returned -11.80% vs +22.43% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), LBO annualized +3.52% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, LBO or VTI?
LBO has been the more volatile fund at 18.8% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: LBO -32.9% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both LBO and VTI?
LBO and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.50, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between LBO and VTI?
LBO and VTI share 11 common holdings with a 0.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2815 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, LBO or VTI?
LBO yields 6.38% while VTI yields 1.07%, so LBO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.