LFGY vs SCHD
YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD delivered stronger 1-year returns. SCHD offers more diversification with 100 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LFGY | SCHD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.02% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $94M | $103.7B | |
| Dividend Yield | 85.42% | 3.31% | |
| Holdings | 86 | 104 | |
| YTD Return | +0.76% | +26.21% | |
| 1Y Return | -6.99% | +29.99% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.73% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.67% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 34.5% | 13.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -35.9% | -33.4% | |
| Fund Family | YieldMax ETF | Charles Schwab Asset Management | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 13, 2025 | Oct 20, 2011 |
LFGY vs SCHD Performance
YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (LFGY) is a ETF from YieldMax ETF and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year LFGY returned -6.99% while SCHD returned +29.99%. Year to date, LFGY is up 0.76% versus a gain of 26.21% for SCHD.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
LFGY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 34.5% compared with 13.6% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.9% for LFGY and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.14. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LFGY charges 1.02% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $102 vs $6 annually, a gap of $96 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LFGY currently yields 85.42% against 3.31% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
LFGY and SCHD share 0 holdings out of 122 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LFGY or SCHD?
LFGY has an expense ratio of 1.02% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $96 per year of difference.
Which performed better, LFGY or SCHD?
Over the past year LFGY returned -6.99% vs +29.99% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), LFGY annualized -2.31% vs +11.50% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, LFGY or SCHD?
LFGY has been the more volatile fund at 34.5% annualized versus 13.6% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: LFGY -35.9% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both LFGY and SCHD?
LFGY and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of -0.14, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between LFGY and SCHD?
LFGY and SCHD share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 122 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, LFGY or SCHD?
LFGY yields 85.42% while SCHD yields 3.31%, so LFGY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.