LFGY vs VOO
YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LFGY | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.02% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $94M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 85.42% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 86 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +0.66% | +13.72% | |
| 1Y Return | -7.09% | +21.63% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.55% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.26% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 34.5% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -35.9% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | YieldMax ETF | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 13, 2025 | Sep 7, 2010 |
LFGY vs VOO Performance
YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (LFGY) is a ETF from YieldMax ETF and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year LFGY returned -7.09% while VOO returned +21.63%. Year to date, LFGY is up 0.66% versus a gain of 13.72% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
LFGY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 34.5% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.9% for LFGY and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.74. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LFGY charges 1.02% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $102 vs $3 annually, a gap of $99 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LFGY currently yields 85.42% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
LFGY and VOO share 4 holdings out of 523 unique holdings combined, representing a 5.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LFGY or VOO?
LFGY has an expense ratio of 1.02% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $99 per year of difference.
Which performed better, LFGY or VOO?
Over the past year LFGY returned -7.09% vs +21.63% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), LFGY annualized -2.38% vs +13.56% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, LFGY or VOO?
LFGY has been the more volatile fund at 34.5% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: LFGY -35.9% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both LFGY and VOO?
LFGY and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.74, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between LFGY and VOO?
LFGY and VOO share 4 common holdings with a 5.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 523 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, LFGY or VOO?
LFGY yields 85.42% while VOO yields 1.09%, so LFGY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.