LFGY vs VXUS
YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LFGY | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.02% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $94M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 85.42% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 86 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +1.45% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | -4.87% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 34.5% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -35.9% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | YieldMax ETF | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 13, 2025 | Jan 26, 2011 |
LFGY vs VXUS Performance
YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (LFGY) is a ETF from YieldMax ETF and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year LFGY returned -4.87% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, LFGY is up 1.45% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
LFGY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 34.5% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.9% for LFGY and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.47. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LFGY charges 1.02% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $102 vs $5 annually, a gap of $97 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LFGY currently yields 85.42% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
LFGY and VXUS share 1 holdings out of 7882 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in LFGY | Weight in VXUS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| GLXY | 4.31% | 0.01% | 4.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LFGY or VXUS?
LFGY has an expense ratio of 1.02% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $97 per year of difference.
Which performed better, LFGY or VXUS?
Over the past year LFGY returned -4.87% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), LFGY annualized -1.91% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, LFGY or VXUS?
LFGY has been the more volatile fund at 34.5% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: LFGY -35.9% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both LFGY and VXUS?
LFGY and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.47, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between LFGY and VXUS?
LFGY and VXUS share 1 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7882 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, LFGY or VXUS?
LFGY yields 85.42% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so LFGY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.