LFGY vs VTI
YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, LFGY or VTI?
Multi Alternative against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LFGY | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.02% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $102M | $690.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 78.62% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 91 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +8.35% | +13.35%Best |
| 1Y Return | -9.21% | +15.92%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +23.41% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.83% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 33.1% | 12.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -35.9% | -19.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.7 years | $10,360 | $13,347Best |
| Fund Family | YieldMax ETF | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jan 13, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 14, 2025 to Oct 2, 2026 (1.7 years).
LFGY vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.7 years both funds cover.
LFGY vs VTI Performance
YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (LFGY) is an ETF from YieldMax ETF and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year LFGY returned -9.21% while VTI returned +15.92%. Year to date, LFGY is up 8.35% versus a gain of 13.35% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
LFGY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 33.1% compared with 12.7% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.9% for LFGY and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LFGY charges 1.02% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $102 vs $3 annually, a gap of $99 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LFGY currently yields 78.62% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 6.7% of VTI's money is in holdings LFGY also owns.
Stated as a floor: for LFGY, our book for it covers 92.3% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
VTI and LFGY share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 46 days apart, LFGY as of Sep 15, 2026 and VTI as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
14 positions in common, counted across the 22 positions we hold weights for in LFGY and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 91 and 3,524.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in LFGY | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 5.37% | 6.40% | 1.03% |
| SQBlock Inc | 5.57% | 0.06% | 5.51% |
| GLXYGalaxy Digital Inc Class A | 5.05% | 0.01% | 5.04% |
| RIOTRiot Platforms, Inc. | 4.67% | 0.01% | 4.66% |
| FIGRFigure Technology Solutions Inc | 4.23% | 0.00% | 4.23% |
| COINCoinbase Globa-A | 4.01% | 0.04% | 3.97% |
| MSTRMicrostrategy Inc | 3.89% | 0.04% | 3.85% |
| PYPLPaypay Holdings, Inc. | 3.62% | 0.06% | 3.56% |
| CRCLCircle Internet Group In | 3.62% | 0.01% | 3.61% |
| CIFRCipher Mining Inc | 3.61% | 0.01% | 3.60% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of LFGY and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LFGY or VTI?
LFGY has an expense ratio of 1.02% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $99 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, LFGY or VTI?
Over the past year LFGY returned -9.21% vs +15.92% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), LFGY annualized +2.10% vs +18.51% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, LFGY or VTI?
LFGY has been the more volatile fund at 33.1% annualized versus 12.7% for VTI. Worst drawdown: LFGY -35.9% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both LFGY and VTI?
LFGY and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between LFGY and VTI?
At least 6.7% of VTI's money is in holdings LFGY also owns. Our book for LFGY is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 14 positions in common, counted across the 22 positions we hold weights for in LFGY and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, LFGY or VTI?
LFGY yields 78.62% while VTI yields 1.03%, so LFGY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than LFGY?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.