LFSC vs VOO
F/m Emerald Life Sciences Innovation ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. LFSC delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LFSC | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.54% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $124M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 40 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +30.91% | +13.79% | |
| 1Y Return | +83.37% | +23.01% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.78% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.39% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 26.5% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -29.7% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Emerald ETF | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 30, 2024 | Sep 7, 2010 |
LFSC vs VOO Performance
F/m Emerald Life Sciences Innovation ETF (LFSC) is a ETF from Emerald ETF and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year LFSC returned +83.37% while VOO returned +23.01%. Year to date, LFSC is up 30.91% versus a gain of 13.79% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
LFSC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 26.5% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -29.7% for LFSC and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.45. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LFSC charges 0.54% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $54 vs $3 annually, a gap of $51 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LFSC currently yields 0.00% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
LFSC and VOO share 0 holdings out of 544 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LFSC or VOO?
LFSC has an expense ratio of 0.54% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $51 per year of difference.
Which performed better, LFSC or VOO?
Over the past year LFSC returned +83.37% vs +23.01% for VOO, so LFSC leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), LFSC annualized +43.80% vs +13.57% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, LFSC or VOO?
LFSC has been the more volatile fund at 26.5% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: LFSC -29.7% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both LFSC and VOO?
LFSC and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.45, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between LFSC and VOO?
LFSC and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 544 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, LFSC or VOO?
LFSC yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.09%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.