LFSC vs VYM
F/m Emerald Life Sciences Innovation ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. LFSC delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LFSC | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.54% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $124M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 40 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | +30.91% | +16.10% | |
| 1Y Return | +83.37% | +25.99% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.29% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.35% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 26.5% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -29.7% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Emerald ETF | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 30, 2024 | Nov 10, 2006 |
LFSC vs VYM Performance
F/m Emerald Life Sciences Innovation ETF (LFSC) is a ETF from Emerald ETF and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year LFSC returned +83.37% while VYM returned +25.99%. Year to date, LFSC is up 30.91% versus a gain of 16.10% for VYM.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
LFSC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 26.5% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -29.7% for LFSC and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.53. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LFSC charges 0.54% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $54 vs $4 annually, a gap of $50 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LFSC currently yields 0.00% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
LFSC and VYM share 0 holdings out of 597 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LFSC or VYM?
LFSC has an expense ratio of 0.54% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $50 per year of difference.
Which performed better, LFSC or VYM?
Over the past year LFSC returned +83.37% vs +25.99% for VYM, so LFSC leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), LFSC annualized +43.80% vs +7.08% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, LFSC or VYM?
LFSC has been the more volatile fund at 26.5% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: LFSC -29.7% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both LFSC and VYM?
LFSC and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.53, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between LFSC and VYM?
LFSC and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 597 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, LFSC or VYM?
LFSC yields 0.00% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.