LFSC vs VTI
F/m Emerald Life Sciences Innovation ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, LFSC or VTI?
Small Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. LFSC led over 1Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 54.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LFSC | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.54% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $126M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 40 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +22.98%Best | +12.43% |
| 1Y Return | +51.26%Best | +15.92% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.42% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.37% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 26.3% | 13.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -29.7% | -19.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.9 years | $17,851Best | $13,645 |
| Top 10 Weight | 54.0% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Emerald ETF | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 30, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 31, 2024 to Sep 28, 2026 (1.9 years).
LFSC vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.9 years both funds cover.
LFSC vs VTI Performance
F/m Emerald Life Sciences Innovation ETF (LFSC) is an ETF from Emerald ETF and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year LFSC returned +51.26% while VTI returned +15.92%. Year to date, LFSC is up 22.98% versus a gain of 12.43% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
LFSC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 26.3% compared with 13.2% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -29.7% for LFSC and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.50. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LFSC charges 0.54% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $54 vs $3 annually, a gap of $51 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LFSC currently yields 0.00% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
89.5% of LFSC's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.2% of VTI's money is in holdings LFSC also owns.
Most of LFSC is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
34 positions in common, counted across the 38 positions we hold weights for in LFSC and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 40 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 38 and 3,463 positions we hold weights for.
VTI holds 1,134 positions LFSC does not, 97.2% of the fund.
Largest: NVDA 6.40%, AAPL 6.29%, MSFT 4.79%, AMZN 3.65%, GOOGL 2.90%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in LFSC | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| TVTXTravere Therapeutics Inc | 8.71% | 0.01% | 8.70% |
| CORTCorcept Therapeutics Incorporated | 6.72% | 0.01% | 6.71% |
| SYRESpyre Therapeutics Inc | 6.70% | 0.01% | 6.69% |
| COGTCogent Biosciences Inc | 6.48% | 0.01% | 6.47% |
| MIRMMirum Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 4.32% | 0.01% | 4.31% |
| BLLNBilliontoone Inc Cl A Common Stock Usd.00001 | 3.86% | 0.00% | 3.86% |
| GHGuardant Health, Inc | 3.81% | 0.03% | 3.78% |
| CYTKCytokinetics Inc | 3.50% | 0.01% | 3.49% |
| UTHRUnited Therapeutics Corp | 3.27% | 0.03% | 3.24% |
| AXSMAxsome Therapeutics Inc | 3.05% | 0.01% | 3.04% |
89.5% of LFSC is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LFSC or VTI?
LFSC has an expense ratio of 0.54% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $51 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, LFSC or VTI?
Over the past year LFSC returned +51.26% vs +15.92% for VTI, so LFSC leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), LFSC annualized +35.66% vs +17.77% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, LFSC or VTI?
LFSC has been the more volatile fund at 26.3% annualized versus 13.2% for VTI. Worst drawdown: LFSC -29.7% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both LFSC and VTI?
LFSC and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.50, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between LFSC and VTI?
89.5% of LFSC's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.2% of VTI's is in holdings LFSC also owns. They hold 34 positions in common, counted across the 38 positions we hold weights for in LFSC and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, LFSC or VTI?
LFSC yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than LFSC?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. LFSC led over 1Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 54.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.