LFSC vs VTI
F/m Emerald Life Sciences Innovation ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. LFSC delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LFSC | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.54% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $124M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 40 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +30.26% | +14.22% | |
| 1Y Return | +79.11% | +22.19% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 26.5% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -29.7% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Emerald ETF | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 30, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
LFSC vs VTI Performance
F/m Emerald Life Sciences Innovation ETF (LFSC) is a ETF from Emerald ETF and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year LFSC returned +79.11% while VTI returned +22.19%. Year to date, LFSC is up 30.26% versus a gain of 14.22% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
LFSC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 26.5% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -29.7% for LFSC and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.49. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LFSC charges 0.54% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $54 vs $3 annually, a gap of $51 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LFSC currently yields 0.00% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
LFSC and VTI share 27 holdings out of 2795 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LFSC or VTI?
LFSC has an expense ratio of 0.54% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $51 per year of difference.
Which performed better, LFSC or VTI?
Over the past year LFSC returned +79.11% vs +22.19% for VTI, so LFSC leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), LFSC annualized +43.24% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, LFSC or VTI?
LFSC has been the more volatile fund at 26.5% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: LFSC -29.7% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both LFSC and VTI?
LFSC and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.49, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between LFSC and VTI?
LFSC and VTI share 27 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2795 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, LFSC or VTI?
LFSC yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.