LFSC vs VXUS
F/m Emerald Life Sciences Innovation ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. LFSC delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LFSC | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.54% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $124M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 40 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +30.48% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +89.20% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 26.5% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -29.7% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Emerald ETF | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 30, 2024 | Jan 26, 2011 |
LFSC vs VXUS Performance
F/m Emerald Life Sciences Innovation ETF (LFSC) is a ETF from Emerald ETF and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year LFSC returned +89.20% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, LFSC is up 30.48% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
LFSC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 26.5% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -29.7% for LFSC and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.32. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LFSC charges 0.54% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $54 vs $5 annually, a gap of $49 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LFSC currently yields 0.00% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
LFSC and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7900 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LFSC or VXUS?
LFSC has an expense ratio of 0.54% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $49 per year of difference.
Which performed better, LFSC or VXUS?
Over the past year LFSC returned +89.20% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so LFSC leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), LFSC annualized +43.77% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, LFSC or VXUS?
LFSC has been the more volatile fund at 26.5% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: LFSC -29.7% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both LFSC and VXUS?
LFSC and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.32, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between LFSC and VXUS?
LFSC and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7900 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, LFSC or VXUS?
LFSC yields 0.00% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.