LIMI vs VOO
Themes Lithium & Battery Metal Miners ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. LIMI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LIMI | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $2M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.46% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 54 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | -10.99% | +13.20% | |
| 1Y Return | +43.93% | +21.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.16% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.42% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 39.5% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -43.8% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Themes ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Commodity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 23, 2024 | Sep 7, 2010 |
LIMI vs VOO Performance
Themes Lithium & Battery Metal Miners ETF (LIMI) is a ETF from Themes ETFs and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year LIMI returned +43.93% while VOO returned +21.62%. Year to date, LIMI is down 10.99% versus a gain of 13.20% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
LIMI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 39.5% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -43.8% for LIMI and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.48. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LIMI charges 0.35% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $3 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LIMI currently yields 0.46% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
LIMI and VOO share 1 holdings out of 551 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in LIMI | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALB | 7.85% | 0.02% | 7.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LIMI or VOO?
LIMI has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $32 per year of difference.
Which performed better, LIMI or VOO?
Over the past year LIMI returned +43.93% vs +21.62% for VOO, so LIMI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), LIMI annualized +34.67% vs +13.51% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, LIMI or VOO?
LIMI has been the more volatile fund at 39.5% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: LIMI -43.8% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both LIMI and VOO?
LIMI and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.48, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between LIMI and VOO?
LIMI and VOO share 1 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 551 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, LIMI or VOO?
LIMI yields 0.46% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.