LLMA vs SCHD
Global X LLM ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Which is better, LLMA or SCHD?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD is less concentrated, with 41.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 98.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LLMA | SCHD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.06%Best |
| AUM | $2M | $119.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.96% |
| Holdings | 12 | 204 |
| YTD Return | -15.95% | +29.95%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +37.26% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.10% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.87% |
| Top 10 Weight | 98.5% | 41.8%Best |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Sep 30, 2026 | Oct 20, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
LLMA vs SCHD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
LLMA vs SCHD Performance
Global X LLM ETF (LLMA) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Year to date, LLMA is down 15.95% versus a gain of 29.95% for SCHD.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LLMA charges 0.75% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $6 annually, a gap of $69 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LLMA currently yields 0.00% against 2.96% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 12 holdings in LLMA and 98 in SCHD, totalling 99.9% and 99.8% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 12 positions we hold weights for in LLMA and 98 in SCHD, against full books of 12 and 204.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 97 positions for SCHD that do not appear in our book for LLMA (99.8% of the fund), and 6 for LLMA that do not appear in SCHD (67.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of LLMA and SCHD you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LLMA or SCHD?
LLMA has an expense ratio of 0.75% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $69 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, LLMA or SCHD?
LLMA yields 0.00% while SCHD yields 2.96%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCHD better than LLMA?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD is less concentrated, with 41.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 98.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.