LLMA vs VTI
Global X LLM ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, LLMA or VTI?
VTI costs less.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI is less concentrated, with 34.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 98.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LLMA | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $2M | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 12 | 3,542 |
| YTD Return | -15.95% | +8.54%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +11.14% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.29% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.84% |
| Top 10 Weight | 98.5% | 34.6%Best |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 30, 2026 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
LLMA vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
LLMA vs VTI Performance
Global X LLM ETF (LLMA) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, LLMA is down 15.95% versus a gain of 8.54% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LLMA charges 0.75% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LLMA currently yields 0.00% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
67.2% of LLMA's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 20.7% of VTI's money is in holdings LLMA also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
6 positions in common, counted across the 12 positions we hold weights for in LLMA and 3,464 in VTI, against full books of 12 and 3,542.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,123 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for LLMA (76.2% of the fund), and 0 for LLMA that do not appear in VTI (0.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
67.2% of LLMA is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LLMA or VTI?
LLMA has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $72 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between LLMA and VTI?
67.2% of LLMA's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 20.7% of VTI's is in holdings LLMA also owns. They hold 6 positions in common, counted across the 12 positions we hold weights for in LLMA and 3,464 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, LLMA or VTI?
LLMA yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.06%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than LLMA?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI is less concentrated, with 34.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 98.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.