IVV vs LLMA
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Global X LLM ETF
Which is better, IVV or LLMA?
IVV costs less.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 98.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | LLMA |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.75% |
| AUM | $850.0B | $2M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 1,018 | 12 |
| YTD Return | +8.54%Best | -15.95% |
| 1Y Return | +10.97% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.51% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.97% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 38.8%Best | 98.5% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Global X by mirae Asset |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Sep 30, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
IVV vs LLMA growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
IVV vs LLMA Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Global X LLM ETF (LLMA) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset. Year to date, IVV is up 8.54% versus a loss of 15.95% for LLMA.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while LLMA charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $75 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 0.00% for LLMA.
Holdings Overlap
23.2% of IVV's money is in holdings LLMA also owns. 48.0% of LLMA's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
5 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 12 in LLMA, against full books of 1,018 and 12.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1 positions for LLMA that do not appear in our book for IVV (19.2% of the fund), and 494 for IVV that do not appear in LLMA (76.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
48.0% of LLMA is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or LLMA?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while LLMA charges 0.75%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $72 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and LLMA?
48.0% of LLMA's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 48.0% of LLMA's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 5 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 12 in LLMA.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or LLMA?
IVV yields 1.09% while LLMA yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is LLMA better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 98.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.