LSEQ vs VTI
LSEQ vs VTI
Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LSEQ | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 2.28% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $16M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.71% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 156 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +18.26% | +14.20% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.40% | +24.16% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.12% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.37% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.5% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -10.9% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Harbor Funds | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 3, 2023 | May 24, 2001 |
LSEQ vs VTI Performance
Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF (LSEQ) is a ETF from Harbor Funds and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year LSEQ returned +20.40% while VTI returned +24.16%. Year to date, LSEQ is up 18.26% versus a gain of 14.20% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 14.5% for LSEQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -10.9% for LSEQ and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.25. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LSEQ charges 2.28% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $228 vs $3 annually, a gap of $225 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LSEQ currently yields 1.71% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
LSEQ and VTI share 130 holdings out of 2806 unique holdings combined, representing a 9.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in LSEQ | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| WBD | 3.52% | 0.09% | 3.43% |
| NEM | 2.42% | 0.14% | 2.28% |
| MSFT | -1.34% | 3.81% | 5.15% |
| FCX | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| JNJ | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| IRDM | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| WMT | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| DBX | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| PINS | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| XOM | Pro | Pro | Pro |
See all 10 holdings LSEQ shares with VTI Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position. Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime. | |||
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LSEQ or VTI?
LSEQ has an expense ratio of 2.28% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $225 per year of difference.
Which performed better, LSEQ or VTI?
Over the past year LSEQ returned +20.40% vs +24.16% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), LSEQ annualized +12.88% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, LSEQ or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 14.5% for LSEQ. Worst drawdown: LSEQ -10.9% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both LSEQ and VTI?
LSEQ and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.25, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between LSEQ and VTI?
LSEQ and VTI share 130 common holdings with a 9.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2806 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, LSEQ or VTI?
LSEQ yields 1.71% while VTI yields 1.07%, so LSEQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.