LST vs VTI
Leuthold Select Industries ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. LST delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LST | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $109M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.15% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 110 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +19.66% | +14.96% | |
| 1Y Return | +30.81% | +22.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.51% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.5% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -19.5% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Leuthold Funds | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 19, 2000 | May 24, 2001 |
LST vs VTI Performance
Leuthold Select Industries ETF (LST) is a ETF from Leuthold Funds and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year LST returned +30.81% while VTI returned +22.39%. Year to date, LST is up 19.66% versus a gain of 14.96% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.4% compared with 14.5% for LST. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.5% for LST and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.89. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LST charges 0.65% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $3 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LST currently yields 1.15% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
LST and VTI share 77 holdings out of 2813 unique holdings combined, representing a 17.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LST or VTI?
LST has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $62 per year of difference.
Which performed better, LST or VTI?
Over the past year LST returned +30.81% vs +22.39% for VTI, so LST leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), LST annualized +23.75% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, LST or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.4% annualized versus 14.5% for LST. Worst drawdown: LST -19.5% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both LST and VTI?
LST and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.89, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between LST and VTI?
LST and VTI share 77 common holdings with a 17.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2813 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, LST or VTI?
LST yields 1.15% while VTI yields 1.07%, so LST currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.