MAGA vs SCHD
Truth Social America First ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Which is better, MAGA or SCHD?
Each has led over a different period.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. MAGA led over 5Y, SCHD over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93. MAGA is less concentrated, with 8.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MAGA | SCHD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.72% | 0.06%Best |
| AUM | $31M | $112.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.45% | 3.00% |
| Holdings | 152 | 103 |
| YTD Return | +6.08% | +23.60%Best |
| 1Y Return | +7.44% | +28.29%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.22% | +16.25%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.50%Best | +10.25% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.1% | 16.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -43.2% | -33.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $16,474Best | $16,289 |
| Top 10 Weight | 8.0%Best | 41.8% |
| Fund Family | Truth Social Funds | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Sep 6, 2017 | Oct 20, 2011 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 7, 2017 to Sep 21, 2026 (9 years).
MAGA vs SCHD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 9 years both funds cover.
MAGA vs SCHD Performance
Truth Social America First ETF (MAGA) is an ETF from Truth Social Funds and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year MAGA returned +7.44% while SCHD returned +28.29%. Year to date, MAGA is up 6.08% versus a gain of 23.60% for SCHD.
Over three years, MAGA compounded at +14.22% per year against +16.25% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are +10.50% and +10.25% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +11.47% annualized vs +10.76%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MAGA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.1% compared with 16.0% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -43.2% for MAGA and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MAGA charges 0.72% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $72 vs $6 annually, a gap of $66 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MAGA currently yields 1.45% against 3.00% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
13.6% of MAGA's money is in holdings SCHD also owns. 42.4% of SCHD's money is in holdings MAGA also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
20 positions in common, counted across the 150 positions we hold weights for in MAGA and 100 in SCHD, against full books of 152 and 103.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 79 positions for SCHD that do not appear in our book for MAGA (57.5% of the fund), and 127 for MAGA that do not appear in SCHD (84.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in MAGA | Weight in SCHD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMGNAmgen Inc. | 0.76% | 4.70% | 3.94% |
| ABTAbbott Laboratories | 0.69% | 4.69% | 4.00% |
| CVXChevron Corp | 0.71% | 4.02% | 3.31% |
| COPConocophillips Common Stock USD 0.01 | 0.75% | 3.94% | 3.19% |
| HDHome Depot Inc/The | 0.63% | 3.88% | 3.25% |
| BMYBristol-Myers Squibb Co. | 0.69% | 3.33% | 2.64% |
| MOAltria Group Inc | 0.67% | 2.79% | 2.12% |
| BXBlackstone Group Inc. Class A | 0.71% | 2.59% | 1.88% |
| UPSUnited Parcel Service, Inc | 0.65% | 1.90% | 1.25% |
| EOGEog Resources Inc | 0.66% | 1.88% | 1.22% |
42.4% of SCHD is already inside MAGA.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MAGA or SCHD?
MAGA has an expense ratio of 0.72% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $66 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, MAGA or SCHD?
Over the past year MAGA returned +7.44% vs +28.29% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), MAGA annualized +10.76% vs +11.47% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, MAGA or SCHD?
MAGA has been the more volatile fund at 19.1% annualized versus 16.0% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: MAGA -43.2% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both MAGA and SCHD?
MAGA and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between MAGA and SCHD?
42.4% of SCHD's money is in holdings MAGA also owns. 42.4% of SCHD's is in holdings MAGA also owns. They hold 20 positions in common, counted across the 150 positions we hold weights for in MAGA and 100 in SCHD.
Which pays a higher dividend, MAGA or SCHD?
MAGA yields 1.45% while SCHD yields 3.00%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCHD better than MAGA?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. MAGA led over 5Y, SCHD over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93. MAGA is less concentrated, with 8.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.