MAGA vs VTI
Truth Social America First ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, MAGA or VTI?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. MAGA is less concentrated, with 8.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MAGA | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.72% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $31M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.45% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 152 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +6.79% | +12.28%Best |
| 1Y Return | +7.88% | +16.78%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.45% | +20.89%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.24% | +11.94%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.1% | 16.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -43.2% | -35.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $16,282 | $17,576Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 8.0%Best | 33.3% |
| Fund Family | Truth Social Funds | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 6, 2017 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 7, 2017 to Sep 17, 2026 (9 years).
MAGA vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 9 years both funds cover.
MAGA vs VTI Performance
Truth Social America First ETF (MAGA) is an ETF from Truth Social Funds and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MAGA returned +7.88% while VTI returned +16.78%. Year to date, MAGA is up 6.79% versus a gain of 12.28% for VTI.
Over three years, MAGA compounded at +13.45% per year against +20.89% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +10.24% and +11.94% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +13.76% annualized vs +10.86%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MAGA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.1% compared with 16.6% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -43.2% for MAGA and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.88. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MAGA charges 0.72% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $72 vs $3 annually, a gap of $69 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MAGA currently yields 1.45% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
95.6% of MAGA's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 17.8% of VTI's money is in holdings MAGA also owns.
Most of MAGA is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
144 positions in common, counted across the 150 positions we hold weights for in MAGA and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 152 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,007 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for MAGA (79.8% of the fund), and 4 for MAGA that do not appear in VTI (2.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in MAGA | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 0.67% | 1.35% | 0.68% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 0.76% | 1.22% | 0.46% |
| BRK.BBerkshire Hathaway Inc Brk/B Us Equity | 0.65% | 1.28% | 0.63% |
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 0.70% | 0.89% | 0.19% |
| WMTWalmart, Inc. | 0.63% | 0.68% | 0.05% |
| CVXChevron Corp | 0.71% | 0.52% | 0.19% |
| BACBank of America Corp.: Financials | 0.67% | 0.55% | 0.12% |
| CATCaterpillar, Inc. | 0.64% | 0.52% | 0.12% |
| HDHome Depot Inc/The | 0.63% | 0.46% | 0.17% |
| AMGNAmgen Inc. | 0.76% | 0.29% | 0.47% |
95.6% of MAGA is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MAGA or VTI?
MAGA has an expense ratio of 0.72% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $69 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, MAGA or VTI?
Over the past year MAGA returned +7.88% vs +16.78% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), MAGA annualized +10.86% vs +13.76% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, MAGA or VTI?
MAGA has been the more volatile fund at 19.1% annualized versus 16.6% for VTI. Worst drawdown: MAGA -43.2% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both MAGA and VTI?
MAGA and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.88, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between MAGA and VTI?
95.6% of MAGA's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 17.8% of VTI's is in holdings MAGA also owns. They hold 144 positions in common, counted across the 150 positions we hold weights for in MAGA and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, MAGA or VTI?
MAGA yields 1.45% while VTI yields 1.03%, so MAGA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than MAGA?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. MAGA is less concentrated, with 8.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.