MBCC vs VXUS
Monarch Blue Chips Core Index ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Which is better, MBCC or VXUS?
VXUS has been ahead.
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MBCC | VXUS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.14% | 0.05%Best |
| AUM | $184M | $158.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.35% | 2.51% |
| Holdings | 26 | 8,747 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.5% | 14.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -30.6% | -29.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 5.2 years | $16,253 | $16,571Best |
| Fund Family | Monarch Funds | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 23, 2021 | Jan 26, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 108 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. MBCC has data through Jun 2, 2026 and VXUS through Sep 18, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 5.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 24, 2021 to Jun 2, 2026 (5.2 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MBCC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.5% compared with 14.9% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -30.6% for MBCC and -29.4% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MBCC charges 1.14% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $114 vs $5 annually, a gap of $109 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MBCC currently yields 0.35% against 2.51% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 24 holdings in MBCC and 8,082 in VXUS, totalling 99.9% and 88.8% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
The two holdings books were reported 122 days apart, MBCC as of Mar 31, 2026 and VXUS as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
0 positions in common, counted across the 24 positions we hold weights for in MBCC and 8,082 in VXUS, against full books of 26 and 8,747.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of MBCC and VXUS you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MBCC or VXUS?
MBCC has an expense ratio of 1.14% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option, by $109 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, MBCC or VXUS?
MBCC has been the more volatile fund at 16.5% annualized versus 14.9% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: MBCC -30.6% vs VXUS -29.4%.
Should I hold both MBCC and VXUS?
MBCC and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, MBCC or VXUS?
MBCC yields 0.35% while VXUS yields 2.51%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VXUS better than MBCC?
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.