IVV vs MBCC
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Monarch Blue Chips Core Index ETF
Which is better, IVV or MBCC?
Nearly the same fund. IVV costs less.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | MBCC |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 1.14% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $184M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 0.35% |
| Holdings | 508 | 26 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.6%Best | 16.5% |
| Max Drawdown | -24.5%Best | -30.6% |
| $10,000 over 5.2 years | $21,089Best | $16,253 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.8%Best | 44.5% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Monarch Funds |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Mar 23, 2021 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized).
The two price series end 108 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. IVV has data through Sep 18, 2026 and MBCC through Jun 2, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 5.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 24, 2021 to Jun 2, 2026 (5.2 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MBCC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.5% compared with 15.6% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.5% for IVV and -30.6% for MBCC. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.95. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while MBCC charges 1.14%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $114 annually, a gap of $111 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.35% for MBCC.
Holdings Overlap
37.9% of IVV's money is in holdings MBCC also owns. 96.8% of MBCC's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
Most of MBCC is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
The two holdings books were reported 153 days apart, IVV as of Aug 31, 2026 and MBCC as of Mar 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
23 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 24 in MBCC, against full books of 508 and 26.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1 positions for MBCC that do not appear in our book for IVV (3.1% of the fund), and 459 for IVV that do not appear in MBCC (60.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in MBCC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.07% | 4.42% | 3.65% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.02% | 4.32% | 2.70% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.69% | 4.19% | 1.50% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.84% | 4.47% | 0.63% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.65% | 4.34% | 1.69% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 1.16% | 4.85% | 3.69% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 1.90% | 3.90% | 2.00% |
| PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc | 0.65% | 4.76% | 4.11% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 1.38% | 3.89% | 2.51% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 0.95% | 4.18% | 3.23% |
96.8% of MBCC is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or MBCC?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while MBCC charges 1.14%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $111 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, IVV or MBCC?
MBCC has been the more volatile fund at 16.5% annualized versus 15.6% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -24.5% vs MBCC -30.6%.
Should I hold both IVV and MBCC?
IVV and MBCC have a monthly-return correlation of 0.95, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and MBCC?
96.8% of MBCC's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 96.8% of MBCC's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 23 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 24 in MBCC.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or MBCC?
IVV yields 1.06% while MBCC yields 0.35%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is MBCC better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.