MBCC vs VYM
Monarch Blue Chips Core Index ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, MBCC or VYM?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MBCC | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.14% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $184M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.35% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 26 | 613 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.5% | 13.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -30.6% | -15.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 5.2 years | $16,253 | $18,915Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 44.5% | 26.1%Best |
| Fund Family | Monarch Funds | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Mar 23, 2021 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized).
The two price series end 111 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. MBCC has data through Jun 2, 2026 and VYM through Sep 21, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 5.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 24, 2021 to Jun 2, 2026 (5.2 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MBCC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.5% compared with 13.5% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -30.6% for MBCC and -15.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.77. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MBCC charges 1.14% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $114 vs $4 annually, a gap of $110 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MBCC currently yields 0.35% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
23.7% of MBCC's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 10.7% of VYM's money is in holdings MBCC also owns.
MBCC and VYM share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 122 days apart, MBCC as of Mar 31, 2026 and VYM as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
6 positions in common, counted across the 24 positions we hold weights for in MBCC and 557 in VYM, against full books of 26 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 522 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for MBCC (86.4% of the fund), and 18 for MBCC that do not appear in VYM (76.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
23.7% of MBCC is already inside VYM.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MBCC or VYM?
MBCC has an expense ratio of 1.14% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $110 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, MBCC or VYM?
MBCC has been the more volatile fund at 16.5% annualized versus 13.5% for VYM. Worst drawdown: MBCC -30.6% vs VYM -15.8%.
Should I hold both MBCC and VYM?
MBCC and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.77, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between MBCC and VYM?
23.7% of MBCC's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 10.7% of VYM's is in holdings MBCC also owns. They hold 6 positions in common, counted across the 24 positions we hold weights for in MBCC and 557 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, MBCC or VYM?
MBCC yields 0.35% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than MBCC?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.