MBSF vs VTI
REGAN FLOATING RATE MBS ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, MBSF or VTI?
Bank Loan against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MBSF | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $247M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 4.37% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 416 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +2.69% | +12.30%Best |
| 1Y Return | +4.74% | +16.08%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.01% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.36% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 1.4%Best | 12.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -1.0%Best | -19.3% |
| $10,000 over 2.6 years | $11,530 | $15,524Best |
| Fund Family | Regan Capital | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | Bank Loan | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Feb 27, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 28, 2024 to Sep 18, 2026 (2.6 years).
MBSF vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.6 years both funds cover.
MBSF vs VTI Performance
REGAN FLOATING RATE MBS ETF (MBSF) is an ETF from Regan Capital and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MBSF returned +4.74% while VTI returned +16.08%. Year to date, MBSF is up 2.69% versus a gain of 12.30% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.3% compared with 1.4% for MBSF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -1.0% for MBSF and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.39. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MBSF charges 0.49% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $3 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MBSF currently yields 4.37% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 26 holdings in MBSF and 3,463 in VTI, totalling 9.6% and 98.1% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 26 positions we hold weights for in MBSF and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 416 and 3,543.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of MBSF and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MBSF or VTI?
MBSF has an expense ratio of 0.49% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $46 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, MBSF or VTI?
Over the past year MBSF returned +4.74% vs +16.08% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, MBSF or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 12.3% annualized versus 1.4% for MBSF. Worst drawdown: MBSF -1.0% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both MBSF and VTI?
MBSF and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.39, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, MBSF or VTI?
MBSF yields 4.37% while VTI yields 1.03%, so MBSF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than MBSF?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.