METW vs QQQ
Roundhill META WeeklyPay ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | METW | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.00% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $26M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 65.33% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 5 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | -24.17% | +19.52% | |
| 1Y Return | -40.39% | +26.68% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +26.64% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 29.9% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -46.7% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Roundhill Investments | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 18, 2025 | Mar 10, 1999 |
METW vs QQQ Performance
Roundhill META WeeklyPay ETF (METW) is a ETF from Roundhill Investments and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year METW returned -40.39% while QQQ returned +26.68%. Year to date, METW is down 24.17% versus a gain of 19.52% for QQQ.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 29.9% for METW. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -46.7% for METW and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.46. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
METW charges 1.00% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $100 vs $18 annually, a gap of $82 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, METW currently yields 65.33% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
METW and QQQ share 1 holdings out of 103 unique holdings combined, representing a 2.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in METW | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| META | 23.53% | 2.78% | 20.75% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, METW or QQQ?
METW has an expense ratio of 1.00% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $82 per year of difference.
Which performed better, METW or QQQ?
Over the past year METW returned -40.39% vs +26.68% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), METW annualized -27.28% vs +13.14% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, METW or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 29.9% for METW. Worst drawdown: METW -46.7% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both METW and QQQ?
METW and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.46, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between METW and QQQ?
METW and QQQ share 1 common holdings with a 2.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 103 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, METW or QQQ?
METW yields 65.33% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so METW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.