METW vs VTI
Roundhill META WeeklyPay ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | METW | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.00% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $26M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 65.33% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 5 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -30.99% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | -41.84% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 28.5% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -47.1% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Roundhill Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 18, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
METW vs VTI Performance
Roundhill META WeeklyPay ETF (METW) is a ETF from Roundhill Investments and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year METW returned -41.84% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, METW is down 30.99% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
METW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 28.5% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -47.1% for METW and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.55. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
METW charges 1.00% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $100 vs $3 annually, a gap of $97 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, METW currently yields 65.33% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
METW and VTI share 1 holdings out of 2788 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in METW | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| META | 23.53% | 1.70% | 21.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, METW or VTI?
METW has an expense ratio of 1.00% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $97 per year of difference.
Which performed better, METW or VTI?
Over the past year METW returned -41.84% vs +22.35% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), METW annualized -32.54% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, METW or VTI?
METW has been the more volatile fund at 28.5% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: METW -47.1% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both METW and VTI?
METW and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.55, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between METW and VTI?
METW and VTI share 1 common holdings with a 1.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2788 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, METW or VTI?
METW yields 65.33% while VTI yields 1.07%, so METW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.