METW vs VOO
Roundhill META WeeklyPay ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | METW | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.99% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $26M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 66.10% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 5 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | -23.40% | +14.48% | |
| 1Y Return | -39.59% | +22.02% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.80% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.3% | 14.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -46.7% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Roundhill Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 18, 2025 | Sep 7, 2010 |
METW vs VOO Performance
Roundhill META WeeklyPay ETF (METW) is a ETF from Roundhill Investments and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year METW returned -39.59% while VOO returned +22.02%. Year to date, METW is down 23.40% versus a gain of 14.48% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
METW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.3% compared with 14.2% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -46.7% for METW and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.58. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
METW charges 0.99% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $99 vs $3 annually, a gap of $96 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, METW currently yields 66.10% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
METW and VOO share 1 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.9% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in METW | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| META | 23.53% | 1.92% | 21.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, METW or VOO?
METW has an expense ratio of 0.99% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $96 per year of difference.
Which performed better, METW or VOO?
Over the past year METW returned -39.59% vs +22.02% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), METW annualized -26.69% vs +13.61% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, METW or VOO?
METW has been the more volatile fund at 30.3% annualized versus 14.2% for VOO. Worst drawdown: METW -46.7% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both METW and VOO?
METW and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.58, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between METW and VOO?
METW and VOO share 1 common holdings with a 1.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, METW or VOO?
METW yields 66.10% while VOO yields 1.09%, so METW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.