MFUT vs QQQ
Cambria Chesapeake Pure Trend ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, MFUT or QQQ?
Allocation/Balanced against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. MFUT led over 1Y, QQQ over the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MFUT | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.89% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $73M | $498.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.42% |
| Holdings | 143 | 321 |
| YTD Return | +19.24% | +22.67%Best |
| 1Y Return | +27.61%Best | +24.33% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +29.05% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +17.00% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.2%Best | 17.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -29.3% | -22.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.3 years | $9,885 | $16,480Best |
| Fund Family | Cambria Investment Management | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity |
| Style | Allocation/Balanced | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 29, 2024 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 29, 2024 to Oct 2, 2026 (2.3 years).
MFUT vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.3 years both funds cover.
MFUT vs QQQ Performance
Cambria Chesapeake Pure Trend ETF (MFUT) is an ETF from Cambria Investment Management and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year MFUT returned +27.61% while QQQ returned +24.33%. Year to date, MFUT is up 19.24% versus a gain of 22.67% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.3% compared with 14.2% for MFUT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -29.3% for MFUT and -22.8% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.34. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MFUT charges 0.89% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $89 vs $18 annually, a gap of $71 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MFUT currently yields 0.00% against 0.42% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
At least 27.5% of QQQ's money is in holdings MFUT also owns.
Stated as a floor: for MFUT, our book for it covers 90.6% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
QQQ and MFUT share little of their money.
9 positions in common, counted across the 42 positions we hold weights for in MFUT and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 143 and 321.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in MFUT | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 2.09% | 8.45% | 6.36% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 1.30% | 7.80% | 6.50% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 0.11% | 5.88% | 5.77% |
| CRWDCrowdstrike Holdings Inc | 1.69% | 0.93% | 0.76% |
| COSTCostco Wholesale Corp. | 0.42% | 1.77% | 1.35% |
| ASML:ASASML HOLDING NV | 0.99% | 0.69% | 0.30% |
| LINLinde Plc Ordinary Shares | 0.72% | 0.95% | 0.23% |
| VRTXNvaesrtex Pharmaceuticals Inc | 0.60% | 0.58% | 0.02% |
| ADPAutomatic Data Processing, Inc. | 0.26% | 0.48% | 0.22% |
27.5% of QQQ is already inside MFUT.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MFUT or QQQ?
MFUT has an expense ratio of 0.89% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $71 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, MFUT or QQQ?
Over the past year MFUT returned +27.61% vs +24.33% for QQQ, so MFUT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), MFUT annualized -0.50% vs +24.26% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, MFUT or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 17.3% annualized versus 14.2% for MFUT. Worst drawdown: MFUT -29.3% vs QQQ -22.8%.
Should I hold both MFUT and QQQ?
MFUT and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.34, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between MFUT and QQQ?
At least 27.5% of QQQ's money is in holdings MFUT also owns. Our book for MFUT is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 9 positions in common, counted across the 42 positions we hold weights for in MFUT and 102 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, MFUT or QQQ?
MFUT yields 0.00% while QQQ yields 0.42%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than MFUT?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. MFUT led over 1Y, QQQ over the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.