MFUT vs VYM
Cambria Chesapeake Pure Trend ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. MFUT delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MFUT | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.89% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $41M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 143 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | +16.82% | +16.16% | |
| 1Y Return | +31.45% | +26.05% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.43% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.21% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.6% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -29.3% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Cambria Investment Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity | |
| Inception | May 29, 2024 | Nov 10, 2006 |
MFUT vs VYM Performance
Cambria Chesapeake Pure Trend ETF (MFUT) is a ETF from Cambria Investment Management and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MFUT returned +31.45% while VYM returned +26.05%. Year to date, MFUT is up 16.82% versus a gain of 16.16% for VYM.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MFUT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -29.3% for MFUT and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.54. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MFUT charges 0.89% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $89 vs $4 annually, a gap of $85 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MFUT currently yields 0.00% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
MFUT and VYM share 23 holdings out of 598 unique holdings combined, representing a 8.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MFUT or VYM?
MFUT has an expense ratio of 0.89% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $85 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MFUT or VYM?
Over the past year MFUT returned +31.45% vs +26.05% for VYM, so MFUT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), MFUT annualized -1.46% vs +7.09% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MFUT or VYM?
MFUT has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: MFUT -29.3% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both MFUT and VYM?
MFUT and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.54, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between MFUT and VYM?
MFUT and VYM share 23 common holdings with a 8.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 598 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, MFUT or VYM?
MFUT yields 0.00% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.