MFUT vs VYM
Cambria Chesapeake Pure Trend ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, MFUT or VYM?
Allocation/Balanced against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. MFUT led over 1Y, VYM over the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MFUT | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.89% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $66M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 143 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +21.18%Best | +10.96% |
| 1Y Return | +30.30%Best | +15.42% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +17.78% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.05% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.5% | 10.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -29.3% | -14.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.3 years | $10,041 | $14,327Best |
| Fund Family | Cambria Investment Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity |
| Style | Allocation/Balanced | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | May 29, 2024 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 29, 2024 to Sep 22, 2026 (2.3 years).
MFUT vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.3 years both funds cover.
MFUT vs VYM Performance
Cambria Chesapeake Pure Trend ETF (MFUT) is an ETF from Cambria Investment Management and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MFUT returned +30.30% while VYM returned +15.42%. Year to date, MFUT is up 21.18% versus a gain of 10.96% for VYM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MFUT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.5% compared with 10.3% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -29.3% for MFUT and -14.5% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.48. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MFUT charges 0.89% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $89 vs $4 annually, a gap of $85 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MFUT currently yields 0.00% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
At least 13.8% of VYM's money is in holdings MFUT also owns.
Stated as a floor: for MFUT, our book for it covers 89.7% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
VYM and MFUT share little of their money.
20 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in MFUT and 557 in VYM, against full books of 143 and 613.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in MFUT | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| KOCoca Cola Co. | 2.06% | 1.38% | 0.68% |
| CATCaterpillar, Inc. | 1.70% | 1.50% | 0.20% |
| MPCMarathon Petroleum Corp | 2.00% | 0.38% | 1.62% |
| UNHUnitedhealth Group Incorporated | 0.63% | 1.52% | 0.89% |
| MOAltria Group Inc | 1.51% | 0.46% | 1.05% |
| NEMNewmont Corp Common | 1.53% | 0.41% | 1.12% |
| PGProcter & Gamble Company | 0.57% | 1.37% | 0.80% |
| RCLRoyal Caribbean Cruises | 1.50% | 0.32% | 1.18% |
| JCIJohnson Controls Intl Plc | 1.43% | 0.36% | 1.07% |
| LINLinde Plc Ordinary Shares | 0.74% | 0.90% | 0.16% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of MFUT and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MFUT or VYM?
MFUT has an expense ratio of 0.89% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $85 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, MFUT or VYM?
Over the past year MFUT returned +30.30% vs +15.42% for VYM, so MFUT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), MFUT annualized +0.18% vs +16.92% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, MFUT or VYM?
MFUT has been the more volatile fund at 14.5% annualized versus 10.3% for VYM. Worst drawdown: MFUT -29.3% vs VYM -14.5%.
Should I hold both MFUT and VYM?
MFUT and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.48, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between MFUT and VYM?
At least 13.8% of VYM's money is in holdings MFUT also owns. Our book for MFUT is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 20 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in MFUT and 557 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, MFUT or VYM?
MFUT yields 0.00% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than MFUT?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. MFUT led over 1Y, VYM over the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.