MGIN vs VOO

MGIN vs VOO

Which is better, MGIN or VOO?

Mid Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.

VOO has a lower expense ratio. MGIN is less concentrated, with 32.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%.

Lower Fees: VOOLess Concentrated: MGIN

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricMGINVOO
Expense Ratio0.75%0.03%Best
AUM-$1.0T
Dividend Yield0.00%1.06%
Holdings50506
YTD Return-0.23%+12.64%Best
1Y Return-+16.84%
3Y Return (annualized)-+22.10%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.87%
Top 10 Weight32.7%Best37.9%
Fund FamilyMan Solutions LLCVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleMid Cap GrowthLarge Cap Blend
InceptionSep 23, 2026Sep 7, 2010

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

MGIN vs VOO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

MGIN vs VOO Performance

Man Active Global Infrastructure ETF (MGIN) is an ETF from Man Solutions LLC and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, MGIN is down 0.23% versus a gain of 12.64% for VOO.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

MGIN charges 0.75% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MGIN currently yields 0.00% against 1.06% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

MGIN already in VOO24.9%
VOO already in MGIN1.4%

24.9% of MGIN's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 1.4% of VOO's money is in holdings MGIN also owns.

MGIN and VOO share little of their money.

13 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in MGIN and 504 in VOO, against full books of 50 and 506.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 486 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for MGIN (98.3% of the fund), and 20 for MGIN that do not appear in VOO (31.9%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in MGINWeight in VOODifference
WMBWilliams Cos. Inc.3.07%0.14%2.93%
PSAPublic Storage2.93%0.08%2.85%
VZVerizon Communic2.67%0.32%2.35%
VTRVentas  Inc .2.86%0.07%2.79%
PLDPrologis Inc1.93%0.20%1.73%
TRGPTarga Resources Corp Preferred2.02%0.10%1.92%
DOCHealthpeak Properties Inc1.81%0.02%1.79%
EXRExtra Space Storage Inc1.47%0.05%1.42%
KMIKinder Morgan Inc./de1.29%0.10%1.19%
OKEOneok1.25%0.09%1.16%

24.9% of MGIN is already inside VOO.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

MGINVOO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, MGIN or VOO?

MGIN has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $72 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between MGIN and VOO?

24.9% of MGIN's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 1.4% of VOO's is in holdings MGIN also owns. They hold 13 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in MGIN and 504 in VOO.

Which pays a higher dividend, MGIN or VOO?

MGIN yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.06%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VOO better than MGIN?

VOO has a lower expense ratio. MGIN is less concentrated, with 32.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.