MHIP vs VTI

MHIP vs VTI

Which is better, MHIP or VTI?

Allocation/Balanced against Large Cap Blend.

VTI has a lower expense ratio.

Lower Fees: VTI

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricMHIPVTI
Expense Ratio0.55%0.03%Best
AUM$2M$666.9B
Dividend Yield0.00%1.07%
Holdings753,543
YTD Return+5.92%+13.59%Best
1Y Return-+20.00%
3Y Return (annualized)-+20.95%
5Y Return (annualized)-+11.81%
Fund FamilyMillimanVanguard (US)
CategoryAllocation/BalancedEquity
StyleAllocation/BalancedLarge Cap Blend
InceptionApr 7, 2026May 24, 2001

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.

MHIP vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

MHIP vs VTI Performance

Milliman Healthcare Inflation Plus ETF (MHIP) is an ETF from Milliman and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, MHIP is up 5.92% versus a gain of 13.59% for VTI.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

MHIP charges 0.55% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $3 annually, a gap of $52 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MHIP currently yields 0.00% against 1.07% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

We hold position weights for 70 holdings in MHIP and 2,788 in VTI, totalling 73.0% and 92.3% of the two funds. Neither is a share of a fund we can divide by, so no overlap percentage is shown here. Within what we can see, 61 positions appear in both.

61 positions in common, counted across the 70 positions we hold weights for in MHIP and 2,788 in VTI, against full books of 75 and 3,543.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in MHIPWeight in VTIDifference
LLYEli Lilly & Co.4.18%1.40%2.78%
UNHUnitedhealth Group3.70%0.52%3.18%
JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common2.73%0.84%1.89%
TMOThermo Fisherscientific Inc.2.73%0.26%2.47%
ABBVAbbvie Inc.1.98%0.61%1.37%
ABTAbbott Laboratories2.08%0.22%1.86%
DHRDanaher Corporation1.94%0.17%1.77%
ISRGIntuitive Surgical Inc1.67%0.19%1.48%
SYKStryker Corp 3.375 11/251.67%0.15%1.52%
MDTMedtronic Plc Ordinary Shares1.35%0.14%1.21%

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of MHIP and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

MHIPVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, MHIP or VTI?

MHIP has an expense ratio of 0.55% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $52 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which pays a higher dividend, MHIP or VTI?

MHIP yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than MHIP?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.