MVAL vs VTI
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Value ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MVAL | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $2M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.73% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 42 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +8.52% | +14.96% | |
| 1Y Return | +13.83% | +22.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.51% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.5% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -19.6% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | VanEck | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 26, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
MVAL vs VTI Performance
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Value ETF (MVAL) is a ETF from VanEck and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MVAL returned +13.83% while VTI returned +22.39%. Year to date, MVAL is up 8.52% versus a gain of 14.96% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.4% compared with 12.5% for MVAL. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.6% for MVAL and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.61. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MVAL charges 0.50% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MVAL currently yields 1.73% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
MVAL and VTI share 41 holdings out of 2787 unique holdings combined, representing a 7.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MVAL or VTI?
MVAL has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $47 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MVAL or VTI?
Over the past year MVAL returned +13.83% vs +22.39% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), MVAL annualized +11.73% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MVAL or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.4% annualized versus 12.5% for MVAL. Worst drawdown: MVAL -19.6% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both MVAL and VTI?
MVAL and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.61, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between MVAL and VTI?
MVAL and VTI share 41 common holdings with a 7.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2787 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, MVAL or VTI?
MVAL yields 1.73% while VTI yields 1.07%, so MVAL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.