NBDS vs QQQ
Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NBDS | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.40% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $143M | $455.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.32% | 0.41% | |
| Holdings | 33 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +19.52% | +19.68% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.41% | +26.75% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.01% | +26.25% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.39% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 24.0% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -29.8% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Neuberger Berman | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 6, 2022 | Mar 10, 1999 |
NBDS vs QQQ Performance
Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF (NBDS) is a ETF from Neuberger Berman and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year NBDS returned +22.41% while QQQ returned +26.75%. Year to date, NBDS is up 19.52% versus a gain of 19.68% for QQQ.
Over three years, NBDS compounded at +23.01% per year against +26.25% for QQQ. Across the full 4-year window we track, NBDS has the edge at +13.94% annualized vs +13.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 24.0% for NBDS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -29.8% for NBDS and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.94. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NBDS charges 0.40% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $40 vs $18 annually, a gap of $22 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NBDS currently yields 0.32% against 0.41% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
NBDS and QQQ share 14 holdings out of 120 unique holdings combined, representing a 22.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NBDS or QQQ?
NBDS has an expense ratio of 0.40% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $22 per year of difference.
Which performed better, NBDS or QQQ?
Over the past year NBDS returned +22.41% vs +26.75% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), NBDS annualized +13.94% vs +13.15% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, NBDS or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 24.0% for NBDS. Worst drawdown: NBDS -29.8% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both NBDS and QQQ?
NBDS and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.94, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between NBDS and QQQ?
NBDS and QQQ share 14 common holdings with a 22.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 120 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, NBDS or QQQ?
NBDS yields 0.32% while QQQ yields 0.41%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.