NBDS vs VTI
Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NBDS | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.40% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $143M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.32% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 33 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +18.28% | +14.22% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.23% | +22.19% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.60% | +21.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 24.0% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -29.8% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Neuberger Berman | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 6, 2022 | May 24, 2001 |
NBDS vs VTI Performance
Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF (NBDS) is a ETF from Neuberger Berman and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year NBDS returned +21.23% while VTI returned +22.19%. Year to date, NBDS is up 18.28% versus a gain of 14.22% for VTI.
Over three years, NBDS compounded at +22.60% per year against +21.27% for VTI. Across the full 4-year window we track, NBDS has the edge at +13.67% annualized vs +8.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NBDS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.0% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -29.8% for NBDS and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.87. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NBDS charges 0.40% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $40 vs $3 annually, a gap of $37 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NBDS currently yields 0.32% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
NBDS and VTI share 24 holdings out of 2790 unique holdings combined, representing a 15.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NBDS or VTI?
NBDS has an expense ratio of 0.40% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $37 per year of difference.
Which performed better, NBDS or VTI?
Over the past year NBDS returned +21.23% vs +22.19% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), NBDS annualized +13.67% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, NBDS or VTI?
NBDS has been the more volatile fund at 24.0% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: NBDS -29.8% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both NBDS and VTI?
NBDS and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.87, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between NBDS and VTI?
NBDS and VTI share 24 common holdings with a 15.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2790 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, NBDS or VTI?
NBDS yields 0.32% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.