NBET vs VTI
Neuberger Berman Energy Transition & Infrastructure ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. NBET delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NBET | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $48M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.44% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 34 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +26.94% | +13.12% | |
| 1Y Return | +31.71% | +20.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.93% | +21.43% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.84% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.1% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -18.7% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Neuberger Berman ETF Trust | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 6, 2022 | May 24, 2001 |
NBET vs VTI Performance
Neuberger Berman Energy Transition & Infrastructure ETF (NBET) is a ETF from Neuberger Berman ETF Trust and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year NBET returned +31.71% while VTI returned +20.82%. Year to date, NBET is up 26.94% versus a gain of 13.12% for VTI.
Over three years, NBET compounded at +22.93% per year against +21.43% for VTI. Across the full 4-year window we track, NBET has the edge at +14.15% annualized vs +8.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NBET has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.1% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.7% for NBET and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.63. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NBET charges 0.65% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $3 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NBET currently yields 2.44% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
NBET and VTI share 17 holdings out of 2801 unique holdings combined, representing a 2.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NBET or VTI?
NBET has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $62 per year of difference.
Which performed better, NBET or VTI?
Over the past year NBET returned +31.71% vs +20.82% for VTI, so NBET leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), NBET annualized +14.15% vs +8.08% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, NBET or VTI?
NBET has been the more volatile fund at 19.1% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: NBET -18.7% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both NBET and VTI?
NBET and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.63, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between NBET and VTI?
NBET and VTI share 17 common holdings with a 2.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2801 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, NBET or VTI?
NBET yields 2.44% while VTI yields 1.07%, so NBET currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.