NBJP vs SCHD
Neuberger Berman Japan Equity ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Which is better, NBJP or SCHD?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. NBJP led over 1Y and the full window. NBJP is less concentrated, with 36.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NBJP | SCHD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.06%Best |
| AUM | $123M | $108.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.95% | 3.00% |
| Holdings | 65 | 206 |
| YTD Return | +16.96% | +20.89%Best |
| 1Y Return | +25.72%Best | +23.87% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +16.42% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.40% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.9% | 14.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -14.3%Best | -16.1% |
| $10,000 over 2.1 years | $14,949Best | $12,955 |
| Top 10 Weight | 36.3%Best | 41.8% |
| Fund Family | Neuberger Berman | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Sep 11, 2024 | Oct 20, 2011 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 12, 2024 to Oct 2, 2026 (2.1 years).
NBJP vs SCHD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.1 years both funds cover.
NBJP vs SCHD Performance
Neuberger Berman Japan Equity ETF (NBJP) is an ETF from Neuberger Berman and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year NBJP returned +25.72% while SCHD returned +23.87%. Year to date, NBJP is up 16.96% versus a gain of 20.89% for SCHD.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NBJP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.9% compared with 14.1% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.3% for NBJP and -16.1% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.37. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NBJP charges 0.50% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $6 annually, a gap of $44 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NBJP currently yields 1.95% against 3.00% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 58 holdings in NBJP and 99 in SCHD, totalling 97.3% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 58 positions we hold weights for in NBJP and 99 in SCHD, against full books of 65 and 206.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 98 positions for SCHD that do not appear in our book for NBJP (99.9% of the fund), and 0 for NBJP that do not appear in SCHD (0.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of NBJP and SCHD you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NBJP or SCHD?
NBJP has an expense ratio of 0.50% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $44 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, NBJP or SCHD?
Over the past year NBJP returned +25.72% vs +23.87% for SCHD, so NBJP leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), NBJP annualized +21.10% vs +13.12% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, NBJP or SCHD?
NBJP has been the more volatile fund at 15.9% annualized versus 14.1% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: NBJP -14.3% vs SCHD -16.1%.
Should I hold both NBJP and SCHD?
NBJP and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.37, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, NBJP or SCHD?
NBJP yields 1.95% while SCHD yields 3.00%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCHD better than NBJP?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. NBJP led over 1Y and the full window. NBJP is less concentrated, with 36.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.