NBJP vs VXUS
Neuberger Berman Japan Equity ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. NBJP delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NBJP | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $129M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.91% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 65 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +19.64% | +15.00% | |
| 1Y Return | +27.29% | +26.87% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.79% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.26% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.7% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -14.3% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Neuberger Berman | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 11, 2024 | Jan 26, 2011 |
NBJP vs VXUS Performance
Neuberger Berman Japan Equity ETF (NBJP) is a ETF from Neuberger Berman and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year NBJP returned +27.29% while VXUS returned +26.87%. Year to date, NBJP is up 19.64% versus a gain of 15.00% for VXUS.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NBJP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.7% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.3% for NBJP and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.89. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NBJP charges 0.50% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $5 annually, a gap of $45 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NBJP currently yields 1.91% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
NBJP and VXUS share 49 holdings out of 7873 unique holdings combined, representing a 3.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NBJP or VXUS?
NBJP has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $45 per year of difference.
Which performed better, NBJP or VXUS?
Over the past year NBJP returned +27.29% vs +26.87% for VXUS, so NBJP leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), NBJP annualized +24.27% vs +4.88% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, NBJP or VXUS?
NBJP has been the more volatile fund at 16.7% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: NBJP -14.3% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both NBJP and VXUS?
NBJP and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.89, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between NBJP and VXUS?
NBJP and VXUS share 49 common holdings with a 3.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7873 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, NBJP or VXUS?
NBJP yields 1.91% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.