NBJP vs VYM
Neuberger Berman Japan Equity ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, NBJP or VYM?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. NBJP led over 1Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NBJP | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $126M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.98% | 2.24% |
| Holdings | 65 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +17.50%Best | +14.82% |
| 1Y Return | +25.45%Best | +20.84% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.64% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.28% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.2% | 10.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -14.3%Best | -14.5% |
| $10,000 over 2 years | $14,955Best | $13,910 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.2% | 25.9%Best |
| Fund Family | Neuberger Berman | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Sep 11, 2024 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 12, 2024 to Sep 4, 2026 (2 years).
NBJP vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2 years both funds cover.
NBJP vs VYM Performance
Neuberger Berman Japan Equity ETF (NBJP) is an ETF from Neuberger Berman and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year NBJP returned +25.45% while VYM returned +20.84%. Year to date, NBJP is up 17.50% versus a gain of 14.82% for VYM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NBJP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.2% compared with 10.3% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.3% for NBJP and -14.5% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.53. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NBJP charges 0.50% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $4 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NBJP currently yields 1.98% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 58 holdings in NBJP and 602 in VYM, totalling 98.4% and 99.5% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
The two holdings books were reported 50 days apart, NBJP as of Aug 19, 2026 and VYM as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
0 positions in common, counted across the 58 positions we hold weights for in NBJP and 602 in VYM, against full books of 65 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 569 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for NBJP (97.2% of the fund), and 0 for NBJP that do not appear in VYM (0.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of NBJP and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NBJP or VYM?
NBJP has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $46 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, NBJP or VYM?
Over the past year NBJP returned +25.45% vs +20.84% for VYM, so NBJP leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), NBJP annualized +22.29% vs +17.94% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, NBJP or VYM?
NBJP has been the more volatile fund at 16.2% annualized versus 10.3% for VYM. Worst drawdown: NBJP -14.3% vs VYM -14.5%.
Should I hold both NBJP and VYM?
NBJP and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.53, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, NBJP or VYM?
NBJP yields 1.98% while VYM yields 2.24%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than NBJP?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. NBJP led over 1Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.