NETL vs VOO
Colterpoint Net Lease Real Estate ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, NETL or VOO?
Mid Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 60.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NETL | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $55M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 4.61% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 24 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +10.80% | +11.55%Best |
| 1Y Return | +8.21% | +17.54%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +8.01% | +20.71%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +1.19% | +12.80%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.3% | 16.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -51.5% | -34.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $10,609 | $18,262Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 60.6% | 36.4%Best |
| Fund Family | Net Lease ETF | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 21, 2019 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 22, 2019 to Sep 10, 2026 (7.5 years).
NETL vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 7.5 years both funds cover.
NETL vs VOO Performance
Colterpoint Net Lease Real Estate ETF (NETL) is an ETF from Net Lease ETF and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year NETL returned +8.21% while VOO returned +17.54%. Year to date, NETL is up 10.80% versus a gain of 11.55% for VOO.
Over three years, NETL compounded at +8.01% per year against +20.71% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +1.19% and +12.80% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +15.51% annualized vs +4.18%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NETL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.3% compared with 16.5% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -51.5% for NETL and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.73. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NETL charges 0.60% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $3 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NETL currently yields 4.61% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
15.5% of NETL's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 0.1% of VOO's money is in holdings NETL also owns.
NETL and VOO share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 49 days apart, NETL as of Aug 18, 2026 and VOO as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
2 positions in common, counted across the 23 positions we hold weights for in NETL and 505 in VOO, against full books of 24 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 494 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for NETL (99.3% of the fund), and 20 for NETL that do not appear in VOO (84.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of NETL and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NETL or VOO?
NETL has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $57 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, NETL or VOO?
Over the past year NETL returned +8.21% vs +17.54% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), NETL annualized +4.18% vs +15.51% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, NETL or VOO?
NETL has been the more volatile fund at 21.3% annualized versus 16.5% for VOO. Worst drawdown: NETL -51.5% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both NETL and VOO?
NETL and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.73, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between NETL and VOO?
15.5% of NETL's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 0.1% of VOO's is in holdings NETL also owns. They hold 2 positions in common, counted across the 23 positions we hold weights for in NETL and 505 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, NETL or VOO?
NETL yields 4.61% while VOO yields 1.04%, so NETL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than NETL?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 60.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.