NRAM vs QQQ
Yorkville America Next Generation Memory Index ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, NRAM or QQQ?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NRAM | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $2M | $506.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.42% |
| Holdings | 10 | 321 |
| YTD Return | -19.99% | +13.00%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +10.81% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +26.04% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.94% |
| Fund Family | Yorkville America Equities, LLC | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Sep 10, 2026 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
NRAM vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
NRAM vs QQQ Performance
Yorkville America Next Generation Memory Index ETF (NRAM) is an ETF from Yorkville America Equities, LLC and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Year to date, NRAM is down 19.99% versus a gain of 13.00% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NRAM charges 0.60% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $18 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NRAM currently yields 0.00% against 0.42% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
At least 7.6% of QQQ's money is in holdings NRAM also owns.
Stated as a floor: for NRAM, our book for it covers 80.2% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
QQQ and NRAM share little of their money.
4 positions in common, counted across the 10 positions we hold weights for in NRAM and 101 in QQQ, against full books of 10 and 321.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of NRAM and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NRAM or QQQ?
NRAM has an expense ratio of 0.60% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $42 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between NRAM and QQQ?
At least 7.6% of QQQ's money is in holdings NRAM also owns. Our book for NRAM is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 4 positions in common, counted across the 10 positions we hold weights for in NRAM and 101 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, NRAM or QQQ?
NRAM yields 0.00% while QQQ yields 0.42%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than NRAM?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.