NTSX vs QQQ
WisdomTree US Efficient Core Fund vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, NTSX or QQQ?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NTSX | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.20% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $1.4B | $483.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.07% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 506 | 107 |
| YTD Return | +8.73% | +17.95%Best |
| 1Y Return | +11.48% | +21.77%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.95% | +25.63%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.62% | +15.24%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.3%Best | 20.6% |
| Max Drawdown | -31.3%Best | -35.1% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $15,120 | $20,324Best |
| Fund Family | WisdomTree Investments | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Aug 2, 2018 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 2, 2018 to Sep 18, 2026 (8.1 years).
NTSX vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 8.1 years both funds cover.
NTSX vs QQQ Performance
WisdomTree US Efficient Core Fund (NTSX) is an ETF from WisdomTree Investments and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year NTSX returned +11.48% while QQQ returned +21.77%. Year to date, NTSX is up 8.73% versus a gain of 17.95% for QQQ.
Over three years, NTSX compounded at +18.95% per year against +25.63% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +8.62% and +15.24% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +19.14% annualized vs +11.99%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.6% compared with 16.3% for NTSX. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -31.3% for NTSX and -35.1% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NTSX charges 0.20% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $20 vs $18 annually, a gap of $2 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NTSX currently yields 1.07% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
At least 91.9% of QQQ's money is in holdings NTSX also owns.
Stated as a floor: for NTSX, our book for it covers 90.3% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
Most of QQQ is already inside NTSX. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
90 positions in common, counted across the 501 positions we hold weights for in NTSX and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 506 and 107.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in NTSX | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 7.49% | 8.44% | 0.95% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 6.60% | 7.27% | 0.67% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 4.94% | 5.76% | 0.82% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 5.46% | 3.36% | 2.10% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.52% | 4.67% | 1.15% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.38% | 4.43% | 3.05% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.17% | 3.16% | 0.99% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 1.97% | 2.78% | 0.81% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 1.02% | 3.45% | 2.43% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 1.41% | 2.56% | 1.15% |
91.9% of QQQ is already inside NTSX.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NTSX or QQQ?
NTSX has an expense ratio of 0.20% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $2 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, NTSX or QQQ?
Over the past year NTSX returned +11.48% vs +21.77% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), NTSX annualized +11.99% vs +19.14% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, NTSX or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 20.6% annualized versus 16.3% for NTSX. Worst drawdown: NTSX -31.3% vs QQQ -35.1%.
Should I hold both NTSX and QQQ?
NTSX and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between NTSX and QQQ?
At least 91.9% of QQQ's money is in holdings NTSX also owns. Our book for NTSX is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 90 positions in common, counted across the 501 positions we hold weights for in NTSX and 102 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, NTSX or QQQ?
NTSX yields 1.07% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so NTSX currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than NTSX?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.