NUMG vs VTI
Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, NUMG or VTI?
Mid Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. NUMG is less concentrated, with 31.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NUMG | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.31% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $355M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.01% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 44 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | -2.49% | +14.05%Best |
| 1Y Return | -6.01% | +16.93%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +8.35% | +22.65%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -1.51% | +12.46%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.6% | 16.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -39.0% | -35.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $9,267 | $17,988Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 31.0%Best | 33.3% |
| Fund Family | Nuveen | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 13, 2016 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 14, 2016 to Sep 22, 2026 (9.8 years).
NUMG vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 9.8 years both funds cover.
NUMG vs VTI Performance
Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF (NUMG) is an ETF from Nuveen and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year NUMG returned -6.01% while VTI returned +16.93%. Year to date, NUMG is down 2.49% versus a gain of 14.05% for VTI.
Over three years, NUMG compounded at +8.35% per year against +22.65% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are -1.51% and +12.46% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +13.79% annualized vs +8.97%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NUMG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.6% compared with 16.0% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -39.0% for NUMG and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NUMG charges 0.31% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $31 vs $3 annually, a gap of $28 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NUMG currently yields 0.01% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
98.0% of NUMG's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 1.8% of VTI's money is in holdings NUMG also owns.
Most of NUMG is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
44 positions in common, counted across the 45 positions we hold weights for in NUMG and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 44 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,108 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for NUMG (95.7% of the fund), and 1 for NUMG that do not appear in VTI (1.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in NUMG | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| LITELumentum Holdings Inc | 4.26% | 0.08% | 4.18% |
| FIXComfort Systems USA Inc. | 3.54% | 0.08% | 3.46% |
| CIENCiena Corp | 3.29% | 0.07% | 3.22% |
| VEEVVeeva Systems Inc | 3.21% | 0.04% | 3.17% |
| IDXXIdexx Labs | 3.02% | 0.06% | 2.96% |
| ALNYAlnylam Pharmaceuticals Inc. | 2.90% | 0.04% | 2.86% |
| KEYSKeysight Technologies Inc. | 2.84% | 0.08% | 2.76% |
| AXONAxon Enterprise Inc | 2.68% | 0.06% | 2.62% |
| RMDResmed Inc. | 2.68% | 0.04% | 2.64% |
| TEAMAtlassian Corp-Cl A | 2.61% | 0.02% | 2.59% |
98.0% of NUMG is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NUMG or VTI?
NUMG has an expense ratio of 0.31% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $28 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, NUMG or VTI?
Over the past year NUMG returned -6.01% vs +16.93% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), NUMG annualized +8.97% vs +13.79% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, NUMG or VTI?
NUMG has been the more volatile fund at 19.6% annualized versus 16.0% for VTI. Worst drawdown: NUMG -39.0% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both NUMG and VTI?
NUMG and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between NUMG and VTI?
98.0% of NUMG's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 1.8% of VTI's is in holdings NUMG also owns. They hold 44 positions in common, counted across the 45 positions we hold weights for in NUMG and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, NUMG or VTI?
NUMG yields 0.01% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than NUMG?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. NUMG is less concentrated, with 31.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.