NUMG vs VTI
Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NUMG | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.31% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $343M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.01% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 43 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +2.04% | +13.87% | |
| 1Y Return | +4.04% | +23.31% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +7.35% | +21.17% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -0.39% | +12.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.7% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -39.0% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Nuveen | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 13, 2016 | May 24, 2001 |
NUMG vs VTI Performance
Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF (NUMG) is a ETF from Nuveen and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year NUMG returned +4.04% while VTI returned +23.31%. Year to date, NUMG is up 2.04% versus a gain of 13.87% for VTI.
Over three years, NUMG compounded at +7.35% per year against +21.17% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are -0.39% and +12.23% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, NUMG has the edge at +9.59% annualized vs +8.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NUMG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.7% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -39.0% for NUMG and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NUMG charges 0.31% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $31 vs $3 annually, a gap of $28 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NUMG currently yields 0.01% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
NUMG and VTI share 41 holdings out of 2785 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NUMG or VTI?
NUMG has an expense ratio of 0.31% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $28 per year of difference.
Which performed better, NUMG or VTI?
Over the past year NUMG returned +4.04% vs +23.31% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), NUMG annualized +9.59% vs +8.13% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, NUMG or VTI?
NUMG has been the more volatile fund at 19.7% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: NUMG -39.0% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both NUMG and VTI?
NUMG and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between NUMG and VTI?
NUMG and VTI share 41 common holdings with a 1.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2785 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, NUMG or VTI?
NUMG yields 0.01% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.