NUMV vs VTI
Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. NUMV delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NUMV | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.31% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $445M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.44% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 95 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +15.58% | +14.20% | |
| 1Y Return | +25.70% | +24.16% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.41% | +21.12% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.97% | +12.37% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.4% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -44.0% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Nuveen | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 13, 2016 | May 24, 2001 |
NUMV vs VTI Performance
Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF (NUMV) is a ETF from Nuveen and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year NUMV returned +25.70% while VTI returned +24.16%. Year to date, NUMV is up 15.58% versus a gain of 14.20% for VTI.
Over three years, NUMV compounded at +16.41% per year against +21.12% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +7.97% and +12.37% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, NUMV has the edge at +9.34% annualized vs +8.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NUMV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.4% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -44.0% for NUMV and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NUMV charges 0.31% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $31 vs $3 annually, a gap of $28 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NUMV currently yields 1.44% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
NUMV and VTI share 84 holdings out of 2793 unique holdings combined, representing a 3.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NUMV or VTI?
NUMV has an expense ratio of 0.31% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $28 per year of difference.
Which performed better, NUMV or VTI?
Over the past year NUMV returned +25.70% vs +24.16% for VTI, so NUMV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), NUMV annualized +9.34% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, NUMV or VTI?
NUMV has been the more volatile fund at 18.4% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: NUMV -44.0% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both NUMV and VTI?
NUMV and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between NUMV and VTI?
NUMV and VTI share 84 common holdings with a 3.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2793 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, NUMV or VTI?
NUMV yields 1.44% while VTI yields 1.07%, so NUMV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.