NUMV vs VYM
Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, NUMV or VYM?
Mid Cap Value against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93. NUMV is less concentrated, with 20.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 26.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NUMV | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.31% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $446M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.34% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 95 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +10.87% | +12.29%Best |
| 1Y Return | +16.28% | +16.61%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.27% | +17.42%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.11% | +12.12%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.3% | 14.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -44.0% | -35.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $14,098 | $17,718Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 20.9%Best | 26.1% |
| Fund Family | Nuveen | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Dec 13, 2016 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 14, 2016 to Sep 17, 2026 (9.8 years).
NUMV vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 9.8 years both funds cover.
NUMV vs VYM Performance
Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF (NUMV) is an ETF from Nuveen and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year NUMV returned +16.28% while VYM returned +16.61%. Year to date, NUMV is up 10.87% versus a gain of 12.29% for VYM.
Over three years, NUMV compounded at +16.27% per year against +17.42% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +7.11% and +12.12% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +9.71% annualized vs +8.76%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NUMV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.3% compared with 14.4% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -44.0% for NUMV and -35.7% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NUMV charges 0.31% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $31 vs $4 annually, a gap of $27 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NUMV currently yields 1.34% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
54.1% of NUMV's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 5.6% of VYM's money is in holdings NUMV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
45 positions in common, counted across the 88 positions we hold weights for in NUMV and 557 in VYM, against full books of 95 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 483 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for NUMV (91.5% of the fund), and 41 for NUMV that do not appear in VYM (42.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in NUMV | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| CAHCardinal Health Inc. | 2.34% | 0.22% | 2.12% |
| STTState Street Corp. | 2.22% | 0.20% | 2.02% |
| BKRBaker Hughes Co | 2.15% | 0.24% | 1.91% |
| HPEHewlett Packard Enterprise Co | 1.96% | 0.26% | 1.70% |
| ADMArcher-Daniels-Midland Co. | 2.06% | 0.15% | 1.91% |
| PRUPrudential Financial Inc | 1.97% | 0.17% | 1.80% |
| EDConsolidated Edison Inc | 1.96% | 0.16% | 1.80% |
| SYYSysco Corp | 1.94% | 0.17% | 1.77% |
| ATOAtmos Energy Corp | 1.73% | 0.12% | 1.61% |
| FERGFerguson Enterprises | 1.66% | 0.18% | 1.48% |
54.1% of NUMV is already inside VYM.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NUMV or VYM?
NUMV has an expense ratio of 0.31% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $27 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, NUMV or VYM?
Over the past year NUMV returned +16.28% vs +16.61% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), NUMV annualized +8.76% vs +9.71% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, NUMV or VYM?
NUMV has been the more volatile fund at 18.3% annualized versus 14.4% for VYM. Worst drawdown: NUMV -44.0% vs VYM -35.7%.
Should I hold both NUMV and VYM?
NUMV and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between NUMV and VYM?
54.1% of NUMV's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 5.6% of VYM's is in holdings NUMV also owns. They hold 45 positions in common, counted across the 88 positions we hold weights for in NUMV and 557 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, NUMV or VYM?
NUMV yields 1.34% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than NUMV?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93. NUMV is less concentrated, with 20.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 26.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.