NUMV vs VXUS
NUMV vs VXUS
Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NUMV | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.31% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $445M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.44% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 95 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +15.58% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +25.70% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.41% | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.97% | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.4% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -44.0% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Nuveen | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 13, 2016 | Jan 26, 2011 |
NUMV vs VXUS Performance
Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF (NUMV) is a ETF from Nuveen and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year NUMV returned +25.70% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, NUMV is up 15.58% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Over three years, NUMV compounded at +16.41% per year against +19.27% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +7.97% and +9.28% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, NUMV has the edge at +9.34% annualized vs +4.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NUMV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.4% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -44.0% for NUMV and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NUMV charges 0.31% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $31 vs $5 annually, a gap of $26 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NUMV currently yields 1.44% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NUMV or VXUS?
NUMV has an expense ratio of 0.31% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $26 per year of difference.
Which performed better, NUMV or VXUS?
Over the past year NUMV returned +25.70% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), NUMV annualized +9.34% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, NUMV or VXUS?
NUMV has been the more volatile fund at 18.4% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: NUMV -44.0% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both NUMV and VXUS?
NUMV and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between NUMV and VXUS?
NUMV and VXUS share 2 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7953 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, NUMV or VXUS?
NUMV yields 1.44% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.