NVDS vs PLTD
Tradr 1.5X Short NVDA Daily ETF vs Direxion Daily PLTR Bear 1X ETF
Which is better, NVDS or PLTD?
Each has led over a different period.
PLTD has a lower expense ratio. NVDS led over the full window, PLTD over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NVDS | PLTD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.15% | 0.98%Best |
| AUM | $11M | $32M |
| Dividend Yield | 21.23% | 4.65% |
| Holdings | 6 | 15 |
| YTD Return | -36.14%Best | -37.36% |
| 1Y Return | -36.92% | -33.60%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -63.96% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 43.0%Best | 54.2% |
| Max Drawdown | -82.4%Best | -83.0% |
| $10,000 over 1.8 years | $2,806Best | $1,906 |
| Fund Family | Tradr ETFs | Direxion Shares ETF Trust |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Trading-Inverse Equity | Trading-Inverse Equity |
| Inception | Jul 13, 2022 | Dec 11, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 11, 2024 to Oct 9, 2026 (1.8 years).
NVDS vs PLTD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.8 years both funds cover.
NVDS vs PLTD Performance
Tradr 1.5X Short NVDA Daily ETF (NVDS) is an ETF from Tradr ETFs and Direxion Daily PLTR Bear 1X ETF (PLTD) is an ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust. Over the past year NVDS returned -36.92% while PLTD returned -33.60%. Year to date, NVDS is down 36.14% versus a loss of 37.36% for PLTD.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PLTD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 54.2% compared with 43.0% for NVDS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -82.4% for NVDS and -83.0% for PLTD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.46. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NVDS charges 1.15% per year while PLTD charges 0.98%. On a $10,000 position that is $115 vs $98 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NVDS currently yields 21.23% against 4.65% for PLTD.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of NVDS and PLTD you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NVDS or PLTD?
NVDS has an expense ratio of 1.15% while PLTD charges 0.98%. PLTD is the cheaper option, by $17 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, NVDS or PLTD?
Over the past year NVDS returned -36.92% vs -33.60% for PLTD, so PLTD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), NVDS annualized -50.64% vs -60.18% for PLTD. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, NVDS or PLTD?
PLTD has been the more volatile fund at 54.2% annualized versus 43.0% for NVDS. Worst drawdown: NVDS -82.4% vs PLTD -83.0%.
Should I hold both NVDS and PLTD?
NVDS and PLTD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.46, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, NVDS or PLTD?
NVDS yields 21.23% while PLTD yields 4.65%, so NVDS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is PLTD better than NVDS?
PLTD has a lower expense ratio. NVDS led over the full window, PLTD over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.